Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Users Online: 490


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 47-52  

Civilian penetrating gunshot injury to the neurocranium in Enugu


1 Department of Surgery, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Teaching Hospital, Enugu State, Nigeria
2 Department of Surgery, Memfys Hospital for Neurosurgery, Enugu State, Nigeria, India
3 Department of Community Medicine, University of Teaching Hospital, Ituku/Ozalla, Enugu State, Nigeria

Date of Web Publication8-May-2017

Correspondence Address:
Ephraim Eziechina Onyia
Department of Surgery, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku/Ozalla, Enugu State
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1117-6806.205751

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Introduction: Civilian penetrating gunshot injuries to the neurocranium are no longer uncommon in Nigeria. Such injuries are however poorly reported. They are associated with poor outcome and, at close range, are frequently fatal, especially when inflicted by high-velocity weapons. Prompt transfer to neurosurgical service and urgent intervention may improve outcome in those that are not mortally wounded. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two patients with civilian penetrating gunshot wounds seen over a 10-year period (2004–2014) at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital and Memfys Hospital for Neurosurgery Enugu were reviewed retrospectively, and their data were analyzed to evaluate factors that impacted on outcome. Only patients with clinical and imaging evidence of cranial gunshot injuries who reached hospital alive were included in the study. The overall mortality and Glasgow outcome score were analyzed. Results: Fifty-two patients with isolated civilian penetrating gunshot wounds were identified (M:F = 7.7:1); mean (standard deviation) age was 32.8 (11.9) years. There was a high correlation (0.983) between the sex of the patients and the outcome. The overall mortality was 30.8%, whereas the mortality for patients with postresuscitation Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score ≤8 was 57%, as against 12.9% in those in whom postresuscitation GCS was >8; meaning that 87.1% of patients in whom postresuscitation GCS was >8 survived. Thirty-one patients (59.6%) had papillary abnormalities. Majority of patients with monohemispheric lesions survived while all those with diencephalic, transventricular, and posterior fossa involvement had 100% mortality. Conclusions: Admitting GCS and bullet trajectory were predictive of outcome.

Keywords: Glasgow coma score, Glasgow outcome score, Penetrating gunshot injury


How to cite this article:
Onyia EE, Chikani MC, Mezue WC, Uche EO, Iloabachie I, Mesi M, Ejembi S, Agunwa C. Civilian penetrating gunshot injury to the neurocranium in Enugu. Niger J Surg 2017;23:47-52

How to cite this URL:
Onyia EE, Chikani MC, Mezue WC, Uche EO, Iloabachie I, Mesi M, Ejembi S, Agunwa C. Civilian penetrating gunshot injury to the neurocranium in Enugu. Niger J Surg [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Sep 17];23:47-52. Available from: http://www.nigerianjsurg.com/text.asp?2017/23/1/47/205751




  Introduction Top


There has been a disturbing change in the trend of civilian penetrating gunshot injuries to the neurocranium in Nigeria in tune with global rise in incidents of gunshot injuries.[1],[2] Injuries result from crushing and stretching of tissues with the nature of the wound, thereof determined by both missile and tissue characteristics.[3] Traditionally, the types of wounds have been described as resulting from high-velocity (>2000 feet/s, or 615 m/s) or low-velocity (<2000 feet/s) missiles, with cavitation phenomenon apparent when velocity exceeds 1000 feet/s (305 m/s).[4] These injuries are often lethal with high early mortality that leaves no room for possible neurosurgical intervention.[5] The reported civilian mortality rates from gunshot wounds to the head (GSWH) in the literature range from 23% to 92%, with those series on the lower end including a number of cases without dural violation.[6] Gressot et al. reported 19% favorable outcome defined as a 6-month Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score of moderate disability or good recovery and 29% poor outcome GOS of persistent vegetative state or severe disability.[1]

There appears to be a rising incidence of gunshot injuries in Nigeria. Increased civil unrest, political thuggery, armed robbery, police brutality, proliferation of arms among others have been proposed as possible reasons for the rising incidence in the Nigerian setting.[7] At the moment, there is a paucity of published data on civilian penetrating gunshot injury to the neurocranium in Nigeria. It then became imperative that the patterns and outcomes of management of this emerging cause of significant morbidity and mortality are studied.

Experience in the military setting have been well documented, but civilian pattern is believed to differ as most result from low missile injuries.[8]


  Materials and Methods Top


The available literature on gunshot injuries in Nigeria was reviewed from a search of PubMed and African Index Medicus and compared with data from recent records of care for these patients in the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital and Memfys Hospital for Neurosurgery Enugu between January 2004 and June 2014. Patients' case notes, operation notes, and radiology records were retrieved and relevant clinical and radiological data were extracted. Only patients who had clinical and radiologic evidence of isolated civilian penetrating injuries to the neurocranium who reached hospital alive were included in the study. Those with perforating gunshot injuries to the neurocranium were excluded as are those with GSWH but without evidence of calvarial breach. Furthermore, those with additional gunshot injuries to other body regions and stab wounds were excluded. All patients had brain computerized tomography scan. None had magnetic resonance imaging. Retrieved data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 and test of statistical significance done. The primary outcome measure was the GOS.


  Results Top


A total of 52 patients met the inclusion criteria and were managed over the period under review (88.5% were males and 11.5% were females). The male to female ratio was 7.7:1. The mean age was 32.8 (±11.9) years. Majority of the patients were in third and fourth decades of life [Figure 1] and [Table 1].
Figure 1: Age distribution of patients

Click here to view
Table 1: Clinicodemographic profile of civilian penetrating gunshot neurocranial injuries

Click here to view


More patients had severe forms of injury with 40.4% having postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of ≤8. GCS was 9–12 in 30.8% and 13–15 in 28.8%. Pupillary abnormalities were found in 31 patients (59.6%).

All patients had cranial computerized tomography (CT) findings of intracranial pellets (100%), followed by pneumocephalus (90.4%), brain edema (86.3%), and subarachnoid hemorrhages (55.8%) [Table 2].
Table 2: Cranial computed tomography findings

Click here to view


In 13.5% of cases, the circumstances surrounding the gunshot injuries could not be verified [Figure 2]. Seventeen patients (32.4%) presented within 24 h of the injury. Ten patients (19.2%) presented within 24–48 h, and 3 (5.8%) presented after 48 h. Thirty patients (57.7%) had a form of surgical intervention as part of their management protocol. The remaining 22 patients (42.3%) were managed conservatively [Table 3].
Figure 2: Etiology of penetrating gunshot injury to neurocranium (*Armed robbery, cultists, terrorism)

Click here to view
Table 3: Determinants of outcome after civilian penetrating gunshot injury to the neurocranium

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Penetrating gunshot injury, the most lethal of all firearm injuries is an emerging leading cause of death among Nigerians. It has been reported to account for 7.2% of gunshots in North-Central Nigeria.[9] We found a male preponderance, most of whom are in the third and fourth decades of life consistent with other findings within and outside Nigeria.[7],[9],[10] This depicts the potential catastrophic sequel of these injuries as patients are in the productive age group with far-reaching consequences to their families and the nation at large.

Majority of the injuries (75%) resulted from assault involving activities such as armed robbery attack, cultic rivalry, communal clashes, and terror raids. Strayed bullets were the cause in 9.6% and attempted suicide in 1.9%. The three most common causes of gunshot injuries in an earlier review in the same region as ours (Umuahia) were armed robbery (31.6%), kidnapping (21.3%), and police brutality (17.9%).[11] Armed robbery attack has been reported as the most common etiology in Abeokuta and Sokoto, Southwest and Northwestern Nigeria, respectively.[7],[12] It is however worth noting that while suicidal tendencies are commonly reported in the Western world, the pattern in Nigeria is a deviation from that.

We noticed a sharp rise in incidence with peaks in 2003 and 2014 [Figure 3], coinciding with election or preelection periods. Similar findings have earlier been documented.[7] The reason for this may not be unrelated to the violence which characterized elections in this part of the world. A focused study on this may further elucidate this trend.
Figure 3: Number of patients seen per year

Click here to view


Only 19.2% of the study population presented to the definitive caregivers within 24 h of the injury (80.8% presented later than 24 h), and 32.7% had definitive intervention within 24 h of presentation to our care. This late presentation may account for some of the recorded mortality. As with other forms of gunshot injuries, this gap in emergency response services has been noted in other studies.[13] Aggressive management with blood products and hyperosmolar therapy was independently associated with survival.[14] This stresses the need for initiation of resuscitative measures early.

It was noteworthy that none of the patients opted for discharge against medical advice. The probably perceived danger when the neurocranium is involved precluded patronage of nonorthodox care commonly observed in the country with no patients leaving against medical advice as often seen in gunshot to other body parts.[15],[16]

The overall mortality in our study was 30.8%. This is consistent with findings by Tsuei et al., who documented overall mortality of 31.3%.[17] However, for the subset of patients with postresuscitation GCS ≤8, the mortality was as high as 57% as against 12.9% in those, in whom postresuscitation GCS was >8. The implication was that 87.1% of patients, in whom postresuscitation GCS was >8 survived. It can then be inferred that the odds favored survival the higher the postresuscitation GCS. As a corollary, mortality has an inverse relationship with postresuscitation GCS. Our study did not include mortality at the scene due to nonavailability of data, but Wintemute et al. reported 27.7% mortality at the scene of the shooting and 84.6% on the day of the shooting for strayed bullets, representing a higher case fatality ratio compared to other forms of gunshot wounds.[18]

A significant association (χ2 = 20.475, P = 0.009) was observed between the seizure type (P = 0.049) and patient treatment outcome.

We noted that majority of the patients who suffered high-velocity penetrating gunshot injuries succumbed (10 out of 16 patients) or were left in persistent vegetative state (4 out of 16 patients), with none having a good outcome (GOS 5). Conversely, a good number (8 out of 36) who sustained low-velocity injuries were able to make complete recovery (GOS 5).

With respect to missile trajectory, majority of the patients with monohemispheric lesions survived whereas majority of those with bihemispheric lesions died. Similarly, all the patients with diencephalic, transventicular, and posterior fossa trajectory had 100% mortality. Similar findings have been reported in the literature to be associated with poor outcome.[10],[17],[19][Figure 4]a and [Figure 4]b is a Cranial computerized tomography scan showing intracranial pellets and bullet trajectory of a typical patient with penetrating gunshot injury to the neurocranium.
Figure 4: (a) Cranial computerized tomography scan (bone window) showing intracranial pellets. (b) Cranial computerized tomography scan (brain window) showing bullet trajectory

Click here to view


In terms of treatment protocol, majority of the patients who had craniotomy survived with complete recovery, mild disability, or severe disability, as opposed to the conservatively managed group in whom majority died, remained in vegetative state or with severe disability. It follows from the foregoing and has been noted in some studies that aggressive institution of appropriate surgical measures should be considered in patients with postresuscitation GCS >8 as it has been associated with spectacular recoveries.[5],[20]


  Conclusions Top


Civilian penetrating gunshot injury to the neurocranium is on the rise with majority of the victims being males in their peak productive age. Deliberate injuries are the predominant etiology. Most patients still have pellets in the cranium at presentation and majority will require a form of surgical intervention. Mortality is relatively high compared to other forms of gunshot injuries with significant neurological sequel. Outcome is greatly influenced by postresuscitation GCS, anatomical trajectory on brain CT scan, seizures, and interventions. Appropriate neurosurgical care is critical and should be made available nationwide in the wake of increased gunshot injuries in Nigeria.

There is a need to find out the mortality among those who have died at scene to have a holistic grasp of the burden of this condition.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Gressot LV, Chamoun RB, Patel AJ, Valadka AB, Suki D, Robertson CS, et al. Predictors of outcome in civilians with gunshot wounds to the head upon presentation. J Neurosurg 2014;121:645-52.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Okie S. Traumatic brain injury in the war zone. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2043-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hollerman JJ, Fackler ML, Coldwell DM, Ben-Menachem Y. Gunshot wounds: 1. Bullets, ballistics, and mechanisms of injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155:685-90.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Miclau T, Farjo LA. The antibiotic treatment of gunshot wounds. Injury 1997;28:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Siccardi D, Cavaliere R, Pau A, Lubinu F, Turtas S, Viale GL. Penetrating craniocerebral missile injuries in civilians: A retrospective analysis of 314 cases. Surg Neurol 1991;35:455-60.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Cirivello M, Bell RS, Armonda RA. Penetrating brain injury. In: Ellenbogen RG, Abdulrauf SI, editors. Principles of Neurological Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. p. 349-62.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Aigoro N, Abbas G. Epidemiology of gunshot injuries in Abeokuta, Southwest Nigeria. Internet J Orthop Surg 2013;20:1-4.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Alvis-Miranda HR, Rubiano MA, Agrawal A, Rojas A, Moscote-Salazar LR, Satyarthee GD, et al. Craniocerebral gunshot injuries; a review of the current literature. Bull Emerg Trauma 2016;4:65-74.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Elachi IC, Yongu WT, Nahachi C, Odatuwa-Omagbemi DO, Mue DD. The pattern of civilian gunshot injuries at a university hospital in North Central Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2015;14:87-90.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Semple PL, Domingo Z. Craniocerebral gunshot injuries in South Africa – A suggested management strategy. S Afr Med J 2001;91:141-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Iloh PG, Chuku A, Ofoedu JN, Ugwele OH, Onyekwere JO, Amadi AN. The emerging trend in the epidemiology of gunshot injuries in the emergency department of a Nigerian tertiary hospital in a State without formal prehospital emergency medical services. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2013;6:435-40  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Oboirien M, Agbo SP, Adedeji BK. Civilian gunshot injuries: Experience from Sokoto, North-West, Nigeria. J Trauma Treat 2016;5:285.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Mohammed AZ, Edino ST, Ochicha O, Umar AB. Epidemiology of gunshot injuries in Kano, Nigeria. Niger J Surg Res 2006;7:296-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Joseph B, Aziz H, Pandit V, Kulvatunyou N, O'Keeffe T, Wynne J, et al. Improving survival rates after civilian gunshot wounds to the brain. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:58-65.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Abbas AD, Bakari AA, Abba AM. Epidemiology of armed robbery-related gunshot injuries in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2012;15:19-22.  Back to cited text no. 15
  [Full text]  
16.
Osime OC, Elusoji SO. Outcome of management of gunshot injuries by Nigerian traditional doctors. Pak J Med Sci 2006;22:316-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Tsuei YS, Sun MH, Lee HD, Chiang MZ, Leu CH, Cheng WY, et al. Civilian gunshot wounds to the brain. J Chin Med Assoc 2005;68:126-30.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Wintemute GJ, Claire BE, McHenry V, Wright MA. Epidemiology and clinical aspects of stray bullet shootings in the United States. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;73:215-23.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Andrade AF, Paiva WS, Luiz R, De Amorim DO, Brock RS. Management of gunshot injuries to the head and brain. Rev Chil Neurocir 2010;34:39-45.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Martins RS, Siqueira MG, Santos MT, Zanon-Collange N, Moraes OJ. Prognostic factors and treatment of penetrating gunshot wounds to the head. Surg Neurol 2003;60:98-104.  Back to cited text no. 20
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1075    
    Printed31    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded50    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal