Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Users Online: 3375


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 21-25  

Histopathological changes in gallbladder mucosa associated with cholelithiasis: A prospective study


Department of Surgery, GGS Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India

Date of Web Publication11-Mar-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Amandeep Singh
Department of Surgery, GGS Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/njs.NJS_15_18

Clinical trial registration CTRI/2018/01/011503

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background and Aims: Cholelithiasis is known to produce diverse histopathological changes in the gallbladder mucosa. In the present study, we aimed to find the correlation between various gallstone characteristics (i.e., number, size, and morphological type) with the type of mucosal response in gallbladder mucosa (i.e., inflammation, hyperplasia, metaplasia, and carcinoma). Methods: The present study was conducted prospectively on 100 patients undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystitis. Gallstones were assessed for various parameters, i.e., number, size, and morphological type. Gallbladder mucosa was subjected to histopathological examination. Sections were taken from body, fundus, and neck of gallbladder. Results: Of 100 cases, maximum type was of mixed stones (54%) and was multiple in number (46%). However, gallstone type and number are nonsignificant variables to produce precancerous lesions (i.e., hyperplasia and metaplasia). Statistically significant results were obtained while comparing the mucosal response with gallstone size (P = 0.012). Conclusion: As the gallstone size increases, the response in gallbladder mucosa changes from cholecystitis, hyperplasia, and metaplasia to carcinoma. Gallstone type and number are nonsignificant variables to produce precancerous lesions.

Keywords: Cholelithiasis, gallbladder mucosa, histopathology


How to cite this article:
Singh A, Singh G, Kaur K, Goyal G, Saini G, Sharma D. Histopathological changes in gallbladder mucosa associated with cholelithiasis: A prospective study. Niger J Surg 2019;25:21-5

How to cite this URL:
Singh A, Singh G, Kaur K, Goyal G, Saini G, Sharma D. Histopathological changes in gallbladder mucosa associated with cholelithiasis: A prospective study. Niger J Surg [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 May 20];25:21-5. Available from: http://www.nigerianjsurg.com/text.asp?2019/25/1/21/253777




  Introduction Top


Cholelithiasis has been described as a disease of civilization. It has been observed in Egyptian mummies dating as far back as 3400 B.C. It appears likely that Charaka (two centuries B.C.) and Sushruta (six centuries B.C.) from India were also familiar with this disease of the biliary tract.[1]

Cholelithiasis is a worldwide medical problem, but the incidence rates show substantial geographical variation, with the lowest rates reported in African populations. In most cases, they do not cause symptoms, and only 10% and 20% will eventually become symptomatic within 5 years and 20 years of diagnosis, respectively.

Cholelithiasis produces diverse histopathological changes in gallbladder mucosa, namely acute inflammation, chronic inflammation, granulomatous inflammation, hyperplasia, cholesterolosis, dysplasia, and carcinoma.[2],[3] When a patient with cholelithiasis becomes symptomatic, therapeutic intervention is necessary. The present study was planned to correlate various gallstone characteristics (number, size, and morphological type) with the type of mucosal response in gallbladder mucosa (inflammation, hyperplasia, metaplasia, and carcinoma).


  Methods Top


The present study was conducted on 100 patients undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystitis due to cholelithiasis, irrespective of age or gender. The following features were noted on gross examination of the gallbladder: dimensions, wall thickness, and mucosa. The gallstones (received either in the specimen or the container) were also subjected to biochemical analysis. The tissue was properly sampled and processed by routine histological techniques for paraffin embedding and sectioning at 4 μ thickness. Histopathological diagnosis was established on hematoxylin and eosin staining of the sections. Four sections including entire wall were obtained: two from body and one each from fundus and neck of the gallbladder. Additional sections if deemed necessary were taken from abnormal mucosa.

Physical characteristics of the stones were noted as per the following parameters: (1) type: based on morphology; (2) number: single/double/multiple; and (3) size: average of two major diameters. In the event of multiple gallstones, the diameter of largest and smallest stone was recorded. Crushed stone crystals were subjected to biochemical analysis for qualitative presence of cholesterol, bile pigments, and mixed components by the method described by Oser.[4]

The pattern of response in the gallbladder mucosa was studied with regard to number, size, and morphological type of the stone(s). The various morphological responses were then categorized into four broad categories – cholecystitis, hyperplasia, metaplasia, and carcinoma.

The data thus collected were systematically compiled and analyzed using analysis of variance for averages and Chi-square test for contingency tables and proportions. Statistical significance was considered when P < 0.05.


  Results Top


In the present study, of 100 cases, majority of the patients (29%) were in age group of 40–49 years [Table 1]. Of the total 100 cases studied, 85% were female and 15% were male patients. Male-to-female ratio was 1:5.7 [Table 2]. Gallbladder size was normal in 59%, enlarged in 27%, and fibrotic in 14% of the specimens [Table 2]. The average gallbladder wall thickness is also shown in [Table 2].
Table 1: Age group distribution (years)

Click here to view
Table 2: Gender distribution and gallstones characteristics

Click here to view


Morphological types of gallstones among the 100 cases found were as follows: 54% had mixed stones, 30% combined, 9% pigment stones, and 7% cholesterol stones [Table 2]. Number of stones varied from a single calculus in 40%, double in 14%, and multiple in the remaining 46% cases [Table 2].

All 100 cases underwent microscopic evaluation and were categorized histologically. In specimens with more than one mucosal response, the predominant pattern was used for categorization (one condition per case) [Table 3]. The majority of cases had chronic inflammation, of which chronic cholecystitis was predominant comprising 79%, followed by chronic cholecystitis with metaplasia in 8% cases [Table 3]. In 2% of cases, carcinoma was observed, while intestinal metaplasia was observed in 1% of cases. All the patients suffering from carcinoma were female [Table 3].
Table 3: Distribution of subjects according to various mucosal responses

Click here to view


Association of mucosal response with gallstone type, gallstone number, gallbladder wall thickness, and gallstone size is shown in [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7].
Table 4: Association of mucosal response with gallstone type

Click here to view
Table 5: Association of mucosal response with gallstone number

Click here to view
Table 6: Association of mucosal response with gallbladder wall thickness

Click here to view
Table 7: Association of mucosal response with gallstone size

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The estimated prevalence of cholelithiasis in India has been reported between 2% and 29%. In India, this disease is seven times more common in North than in South India.[5] The present study was conducted to evaluate 100 patients with cholelithiasis undergoing cholecystectomy with an aim to correlate various gallstone characteristics with morphological mucosal responses in the gallbladder.

The majority of the patients in this study were between the age group of 40 and 49 years, with a mean age of 44.1 years [Table 1]. Our results were in concordance with the results obtained by Khanna et al.,[6] Tyagi et al.,[7] and Singh et al.,[8] who reported the mean age of 42.5, 43.6, and 45.3 years, respectively. Eighty-five percent of the patients we studied were female [Table 2]. Similar results have been reported in the studies of Mathur et al.[1] and Mohan et al.,[5] who reported that 86.97% and 86.54% of patients were female, respectively. The age and gender distribution of present as well as previous studies indicate that the incidence of cholelithiasis is higher in adult females. This may be due to decrease in activity of cholesterol reductase and increase in activity of HMG-CoA reductase with age, resulting in increased cholesterol secretion and saturation of bile. The female sex hormones may also expose them to factors that possibly promote the formation of gallstones.[5]

In the present study, we observed that mixed stones were most common (54%) and the others were less frequent [Table 2]. Similar results have reported in the past in the studies of Mohan et al.[5] and Baig et al.,[9] i.e., 70% and 62.3%, respectively.

We also observed that multiple stones (46%) were more common than solitary or two stones, suggesting that symptomatic gallbladder disease is associated more frequently in patients with multiple gallstones in comparison to patients with solitary stones[7] [Table 2]. The comparatively higher percentage of solitary stones (40%) in the present study might be due to increased incidence of combined stones in our study which occur predominantly solitary.

We found that average wall thickness of the gallbladder was normal (up to 3 mm) in 56% of the cases, while it was thickened in 44% of the cases in the present study [Table 2]. Khanna et al.[6] reported thickened gallbladder wall in 57.5% of the cases.

Cholelithiasis represents one of the most frequent medical situations requiring surgical intervention. Frequently, chronic cholecystitis presents a large range of associated lesions such as cholesterolosis, muscle hypertrophy, adenomatous proliferation of the mucous glands, metaplasia, hyperplasia, and dysplasia. The last three lesions are unanimously recognized as precursor lesions with cancerous potential.[10]

We found chronic changes in the form of chronic cholecystitis and chronic cholecystitis with metaplasia being more common histological finding than other changes [Table 3]. Similar findings have been reported in the past who reported preponderance of chronic cholecystitis in gallstone patients in their studies.[5],[7],[9]

Precancerous changes of gallbladder mucosa are of particular importance for both the clinical and pathological standpoints. Improved diagnostic procedures allow recognizing invasive carcinoma more frequently at early or resectable stage. However, precancerous conditions may be overlooked by a pathologist in the lack of vision of any correlation with gallstone disease.

We observed precancerous lesions (which included both hyperplasia and metaplasia) in 15% of cases [Table 3]. Similar results have been reported in the studies of Stancu et al.[11] and Baig et al.,[9] who have reported the prevalence of hyperplasia in 7.8 and 12.5% of cases, respectively. Mechanical irritation by the calculi could be the possible explanation for these changes as proposed by Elfving et al.[12]

While trying to associate mucosal response with the type of gallstone [Table 4], it was found that precancerous lesions (hyperplasia and metaplasia) although clinically seem to be more common in mixed and combined type of stones as compared to cholesterol stone, this association could not reach statistical significance (P = 0.982) on statistical analysis. Khanna et al.[6] and Mathur et al.[1] also reported similar findings in their studies.

Another interesting finding was that cholecystitis, hyperplasia, metaplasia, and carcinoma, i.e., all the lesions, were more common with multiple gallstones [Table 5]. However, on statistical analysis, nonsignificant results were obtained (P = 0.570). Mathur et al.[1] also could not demonstrate any significant association between mucosal response and number of gallstones (P > 0.05).

Although we could not establish statistical correlation (P = 0.136) between precancerous conditions and gallbladder wall thickness, definitely wall thickness was >3 mm in patients with established carcinoma [Table 6]. Jung et al.[13] and Bazoua et al.[14] also reported increased gallbladder wall thickness in carcinoma cases. We also observed that wall thickness was least in cholecystitis cases, gradually increasing in metaplasia and hyperplasia cases, and abruptly increasing in carcinoma cases.

The size of gallstones impacting on the gallbladder wall is a strong indicator for the possible repeated mechanical irritation of gallbladder mucosa, larger size leading to an extreme filling of the gallbladder lumen volume and causing more irritation. This may cause mechanical damage during the normal contraction and relaxation cycles of the gallbladder that could then lead to further dysfunctional changes.[15]

In this study, the average size of stone (s) was found to be maximum in cases with carcinoma (4.0 cm), followed by hyperplasia (1.42 cm), metaplasia (0.88 cm), and cholecystitis (0.70 cm). This correlation between average size of the stone and type of mucosal response was found to be statistically significant [P = 0.012, [Table 7]. Thus, it indicates that the average size of gallstones in cases with carcinoma was significantly more as compared to inflammation and premalignant lesions. Lowenfels et al.[16] reported that 40% of the patients with gallbladder carcinoma had stones that were more than 3 cm in size. Vitetta et al.[15] and Hsing et al.[17] have reported similar findings in their studies. However, case–control studies of Roa et al.[18] and Moerman et al.[19] found no relationship between size and gallbladder cancer.

Hence, it can be concluded that gallstones are accompanied by major changes in the gallbladder epithelium. This is mainly due to the large size stones leading to more irritation to the mucosa in addition to the toxic effect of the lithogenic bile which produces chemical injury to the mucosa. While the exact cause-and-effect relationship cannot be substantiated with the present study, but surely, constant erosion of the gallbladder wall by gallstones over time constitutes an important risk factor for the development of gallbladder malignancy. Gallstone number and type are less important variables. The identification of premalignant modifications in the morphologic background of chronic cholecystitis is an argument in favor of metaplasia-dysplasia-neoplasia sequence. However, being a small population study, conclusions cannot be drawn and large multicenter study involving large population is desirable to confirm the findings of the present study.


  Conclusion Top


We conclude that as the gallstone size increases, the reaction in the gallbladder mucosa changes from cholecystitis, hyperplasia, and metaplasia to carcinoma. Gallstone number and type are less important variables associated with these changes.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Mathur SK, Duhan A, Singh S, Aggarwal M, Aggarwal G, Sen R, et al. Correlation of gallstone characteristics with mucosal changes in gall bladder. Trop Gastroenterol 2012;33:39-44.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Njeze GE. Gallstones. Niger J Surg 2013;19:49-55.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
3.
Baidya R, Sigdel B, Baidya NL. Histopathological changes in gallbladder mucosa associated with cholelithiasis. J Pathol Nepal 2012;2:224-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Narang S, Goyal P, Bal MS, Bandlish U, Goyal S. Gall stones size, number, biochemical analysis and lipidogram- an association with gall bladder cancer: A study of 200 cases. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014;2:020310.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mohan H, Punia RP, Dhawan SB, Sekhon MS. Morphological spectrum of gallstone disease in 1100 cholecystectomies in North India. Indian J Surg 2005;67:140-2.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Khanna R, Chansuria R, Kumar M, Shukla HS. Histological changes in gallbladder due to stone disease. Indian J Surg 2006;68:201-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Tyagi SP, Tyagi N, Maheshwari V, Ashraf SM, Sahoo P. Morphological changes in diseased gall bladder: A study of 415 cholecystectomies at Aligarh. J Indian Med Assoc 1992;90:178-81.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Singh UR, Agarwal S, Misra K. Histopathological study of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. Indian J Med Res 1989;90:285-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Baig SJ, Biswas S, Das S, Basu K, Chattopadhyay G. Histopathological changes in gallbladder mucosa in cholelithiasis: Correlation with chemical composition of gallstones. Trop Gastroenterol 2002;23:25-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Johnston DE, Kaplan MM. Pathogenesis and treatment of gallstones. N Engl J Med 1993;328:412-21.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Stancu M, Căruntu ID, Giuşcă S, Dobrescu G. Hyperplasia, metaplasia, dysplasia and neoplasia lesions in chronic cholecystitis – A morphologic study. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2007;48:335-42.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Elfving G, Teir H, Degert H, Mäkelä V. Mucosal hyperplasia in the gallbladder demonstrated by plastic models. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1969;77:384-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Jung SE, Lee JM, Lee K, Rha SE, Choi BG, Kim EK, et al. Gallbladder wall thickening: MR imaging and pathologic correlation with emphasis on layered pattern. Eur Radiol 2005;15:694-701.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bazoua G, Hamza N, Lazim T. Do we need histology for a normal-looking gallbladder? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007;14:564-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Vitetta L, Sali A, Little P, Mrazek L. Gallstones and gall bladder carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg 2000;70:667-73.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lowenfels AB, Lindström CG, Conway MJ, Hastings PR. Gallstones and risk of gallbladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1985;75:77-80.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Hsing AW, Gao YT, Han TQ, Rashid A, Sakoda LC, Wang BS, et al. Gallstones and the risk of biliary tract cancer: A population-based study in China. Br J Cancer 2007;97:1577-82.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Roa I, Ibacache G, Roa J, Araya J, de Aretxabala X, Muñoz S, et al. Gallstones and gallbladder cancer-volume and weight of gallstones are associated with gallbladder cancer: A case-control study. J Surg Oncol 2006;93:624-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Moerman CJ, Lagerwaard FJ, Bueno de Mesquita HB, van Dalen A, van Leeuwen MS, Schrover PA, et al. Gallstone size and the risk of gallbladder cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:482-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed327    
    Printed37    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal