|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 70-75
Rare breast malignancy subtypes: A cytological, histological, and immunohistochemical correlation
Manmeet Kaur, Kanwardeep Kaur Tiwana, Nisha Singla
Department of Pathology, GGS Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India
|Date of Web Publication||11-Mar-2019|
Dr. Kanwardeep Kaur Tiwana
H No. 75, Medical Campus, Sadiq Road, Faridkot - 151 203, Punjab
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Breast malignancies encompass various subtypes which differ in their clinical presentations, outcomes, and response to the treatment regimens. Thus, a proper histological diagnosis and a special mention of the rare histologic subtypes are required to formulate clear recommendations of their treatment protocols. Materials and Methods: This is a 1-year retrospective study highlighting the rarely encountered subtypes on the mastectomy specimens received. Results: We encountered only 11 rare cases out of the total 153 mastectomy specimens received. The rare subtypes were as follows mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (0.6%), mucinous carcinoma (0.6%), dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (0.6%), Squamous cell carcinoma (0.6%), papillary carcinoma (2.6%), medullary carcinoma (0.6%), and malignant mesenchymal tumor (1.3%). Conclusion: Our data suggest that these variants are distinct clinicopathological entities with a unique hormonal receptor status. Scant information is available on the rare breast tumor subtypes.
Keywords: Cystadenocarcinoma dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, malignant mesenchymal tumor, medullary carcinoma, papillary carcinoma
|How to cite this article:|
Kaur M, Tiwana KK, Singla N. Rare breast malignancy subtypes: A cytological, histological, and immunohistochemical correlation. Niger J Surg 2019;25:70-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Kaur M, Tiwana KK, Singla N. Rare breast malignancy subtypes: A cytological, histological, and immunohistochemical correlation. Niger J Surg [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 28];25:70-5. Available from: http://www.nigerianjsurg.com/text.asp?2019/25/1/70/253782
| Introduction|| |
Invasive breast carcinomas are a group of malignant epithelial tumors characterized by invasion of the adjacent tissues and tendency to metastasis. The majority of these are adenocarcinomas derived from the terminal duct lobular unit.
The WHO categorizes the breast tumors in 21 distinct histological types on the basis of cell morphology and architecture. Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of no special type (ductal) is the most common type of invasive breast cancer accounting for approximately 65%–80% of the invasive breast neoplasms.,, The invasive lobular carcinoma lags behind IDC (second most common) and accounts for only 5%–15% of the disease burden.,, A widely accepted fact that the aggressive nature of the breast cancer can be determined by its histological type, grade, nodal status, and metastasis holds the ground even in the era of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular pathology.,
The histological diversity of breast carcinomas has relevant prognostic implications as the management of breast tumors is a real challenge in the daily clinical practice. The rare subtypes include other epithelial tumors such as tubular carcinomas (2%), medullary carcinomas (1%), papillary carcinoma, metaplastic carcinoma (<1%), and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) and other mesenchymal and stromal tumors/fibroepithelial tumors such as malignant lymphomas. The conventional paclitaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy cannot be used in these variants; therefore, the accurate identification and diagnosis is required for the proper treatment of these patients.
Ethical approval was obtained for this study. Informed consent was taken from every patient before the cytological procedure, mastectomy, histopathological examination, and IHC were carried out.
This is a retrospective study in which the rare variants of breast tumors were highlighted using cytological, histopathological, and immunochemical techniques.
| Materials and Methods|| |
A 1-year study was conducted during the period of April 2017 to April 2018 on 153 mastectomy and lumpectomy specimens irrespective of the preoperative chemotherapy status. All the specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and were adequately grossed. The sections were stained using hematoxylin and eosin and were examined under a light microscope. IHC including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2neu, and other markers was used, wherever necessary and applicable. The fine-needle aspiration slides of all the cases were reviewed retrospectively.
| Results|| |
The present study is a retrospective study of 153 cases. The patient's age ranged from 28 years to 85 years, and the mean was 52.9 ± 9.7 years. Of the total, 141 (92.1%) cases were reported as IDC. Only 11 (7.2%) cases were diagnosed as the rare histological variants of breast malignancy. These rare variants included papillary carcinoma (4), malignant mesenchymal tumor (2), mucinous carcinoma (1), mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (1), medullary carcinoma (1), SqCC (1), dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) (1). The details of these rare histological variants including the case summaries, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) findings, and histopathological and IHC findings are highlighted in [Table 1]. Herein, we are discussing all the important gross and histological features of the rare variants.
|Table 1: Details of the rare cases highlighting cytology, histopathological, and immunohistochemistry findings|
Click here to view
We received a mastectomy specimen measuring 12 cm × 10 cm × 6 cm with a mucinous grayish-white growth [Figure 1]. On microscopy, numerous dilated mucin-filled cystic spaces lined by tall columnar cells with abundant intra- and extracytoplasmic mucin, basally placed nuclei, and inconspicuous nucleoli were seen. The cells were CK-7 positive and CK-20, ER, PR, and HER2neu negative.
|Figure 1: Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (a) photomicrograph showing gross appearance (b) H and E (×400) (c) CK-7 + (×400)|
Click here to view
A 47-year-female presented to surgery outpatient department (OPD) with a breast lump for which mastectomy was done [Figure 2]. Serial sections through the specimen showed a grayish-white firm growth involving the overlying skin. On histopathological sections, a hypercellular tumor comprised monotonous oval-to-spindle cells resembling fibroblasts arranged in storiform pattern involving the dermis. On IHC, the cells were strongly positive for CD34 (4+).
|Figure 2: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (a) photomicrograph showing fine-needle aspiration cytology smears May–Grunwald–Giemsa (×400) (b) gross appearance (c) H and E sections (×400) (d) CD-34 (4 +) (×400)|
Click here to view
A 49-year-old female presented to gynecology OPD with a 5 cm × 4 cm lump in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast. On serial slicing the mastectomy specimen, there was a large gray-white growth involving almost the entire breast. On microscopic examination, there were syncytial growth pattern, absence of gland formation, marked nuclear pleomorphism, and diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. On IHC, the tumor was triple receptor negative and also negative for S-100 [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: Medullary carcinoma (a) photomicrograph of fine-needle aspiration cytology smears May–Grunwald–Giemsa (×400) (b) gross examination of the mastectomy specimen (c) H and E sections (×400) (d) estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors-negative (×400)|
Click here to view
Malignant mesenchymal tumor
Primary mesenchymal tumors are a rare malignancy of the breast. We encountered two female patients aged 28 years and 47 years. On histopathology sections of both the patients, there were pleomorphic oval- and spindle-shaped cells exhibiting marked nuclear atypia, mitosis, atypical mitotic figures, and a background of necrosis [Figure 4]. The tumor cells were positive for vimentin and negative for S-100.
|Figure 4: Malignant mesenchymal tumor (a) photomicrograph showing gross appearance (b) H and E sections (×400) (c) vimentin strongly positive (×400)|
Click here to view
A 38-year-old female presented with a lump which grossly was gelatinous in appearance with bosselated pushing margins. On histopathological examination, there were clusters of uniform round cells with minimal amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm floating in pools of mucin. These cells were positive for ER, PR, and CK-7 and negative for HER2neu and CK-20 [Figure 5].
|Figure 5: Mucinous carcinoma (a and b) photomicrograph showing H and E sections (×400) (c) CK-7 positive and CK-20 negative|
Click here to view
Squamous cell carcinoma
We received a mastectomy specimen of a 43-year-old female with a 15-cm × 14-cm lump in the right breast. The tumor was involving the entire breast and causing ulceration of the overlying skin and nipple areola complex. On microscopy, the tumor was comprised >90% cells which were well-differentiated squamous cells. Extensive keratin pearl formation was also appreciated [Figure 6].
|Figure 6: Squamous cell carcinoma (a) fine-needle aspiration cytology smears on May–Grunwald–Giemsa (×400) (b and c) H and E-stained sections showing keratin pearl formation|
Click here to view
Over a period of 1 year, we encountered four cases of papillary carcinoma all of which were postmenopausal females. On microscopy, all the cases had well-formed papillae and absent myoepithelial cell layer. In one of the cases, we saw a mixed pattern, comprised IDC, extensive in situ carcinoma, comedocarcinoma, and invasive papillary component. Only one case was positive for ER, rest all were negative for ER, PR, and Her2neu [Figure 7].
|Figure 7: Papillary carcinoma (a) H and E sections (×400) showing both invasive ductal carcinoma and papillary (b) H and E sections from another patient showing invasive papillary carcinoma (×400) (c) Immunohistochemistry sections showing strongly positive estrogen receptors and weakly positive progesterone receptors|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The rare and the special histological variants of breast malignancies often have a peculiar clinical behavior. However, considering the underlying fact that due to the rarity of these malignancies, the therapeutic regimen formulations are greatly affected. As a consequence, the clear treatment guidelines and recommendations are lacking for these variants.
Herein, we are discussing the different types of breast malignancies which are rarely encountered on the day-to-day pathology practice.
An extremely rare variant of primary breast carcinoma belongs to the family of mucin-producing carcinoma sharing the same histology as the mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary and pancreas.,,,,,, Similar to our case, most of these tumors are reported in postmenopausal females aged between 47 and 96 years.,,,,,,
DFSP is a mesenchymal neoplasm of the dermis and subcutis. It is a rare soft-tissue neoplasm, originally described in 1924 by Darier and Ferrand with a reported incidence of five cases per one million individuals per year.,, This tumor rarely occurs in the breast and is the differential diagnosis includes other stromal tumors such as phyllodes tumor, pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia, myofibroblastoma, leiomyoma, and periductal stromal sarcomas.
These represent <2% of breast carcinoma and occur frequently in the younger women. Despite their aggressive look, these have a good prognosis.,
Malignant mesenchymal tumor
Primary mesenchymal tumors/malignant tumors originating from mesenchymal tissue are rare malignancy of the breast. The metaplastic carcinomas which are characterized by a combination of mesenchymal and epithelial components are uncommon malignancies of the breast. Pure primary sarcomas are the rarest malignancies in mammary tissue. Few of the reported sarcomas include primary chondrosarcoma, spindle cell sarcoma, neuroectodermal tumor, and angiosarcoma.
Pure mucinous carcinomas (mucin component >90%) account for only about 2% of the breast carcinomas. Mucinous carcinoma of the breast is one of the rarer forms of intramammary cancer, often presenting as a lobulated, fairly well-circumscribed mass on mammography, sonography, and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It accounts for 1%–7% of all breast cancers and generally carries a better prognosis than other types of malignant breast cancers. Metastatic disease occurs at a lower frequency than in other types of invasive carcinoma. We present an atypical case of mucinous carcinoma in a woman who presented with a palpable intramammary lymph node metastasis from an unknown breast primary. Subsequent MRI and percutaneous biopsy demonstrated histologic findings consistent with a mixed mucinous neoplasm with a micropapillary pattern.
Invasive mucinous carcinoma of the breast is one of the rarer breast neoplasms and is typically associated with a better prognosis, a longer disease-free interval, and a lower incidence of axillary node metastasis. It often presents as a lobulated and/or well-circumscribed mass on mammography, sonography, and MRI.
Squamous cell carcinoma
Pure primary SqCC of the breast is a rare (<0.1%) and aggressive tumor. It is considered to arise from metaplastic change of the ductal carcinoma cells., This is a very aggressive, hormone receptor negative, and treatment refractory tumor with poor prognosis. The treatment of primary SqCC of the breast does not differ from other common histological types of breast cancer and may involve surgery, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiation therapy.
A rare variant of breast carcinoma comprises <2% of the breast malignancies. It is predominantly seen in the postmenopausal women. Histologically, it is characterized by papillary lesion with absent myoepithelial cell layer.,,
| Conclusion|| |
Due to the rarity of these tumors, there is an extreme paucity of literature in this area. Most of the literature available is in the form of case reports. Herein, we highlighted these rare diagnosis taking into consideration the cytological, histopathological, and immunohistochemical findings. Thus, a proper histological diagnosis and a special mention of the rare histologic subtypes are required to formulate clear recommendations of their treatment protocols.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Sastre-Garau X, Bussolati G, Tavassoli FA, Eusebi V, et al
. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. 4th
ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2012.
Suryadevara A, Paruchuri LP, Banisaeed N, Dunnington G, Rao KA. The clinical behavior of mixed ductal/lobular carcinoma of the breast: A clinicopathologic analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2010;8:51.
Dieci MV, Orvieto E, Dominici M, Conte P, Guarneri V. Rare breast cancer subtypes: Histological, molecular, and clinical peculiarities. Oncologist 2014;19:805-13.
Lee JH, Park S, Park HS, Park BW. Clinicopathological features of infiltrating lobular carcinomas comparing with infiltrating ductal carcinomas: A case control study. World J Surg Oncol 2010;8:34.
Anderson TJ, Davis C, Alexander FE, Dobson HM; Scottish Breast Pathology Coordination Group. Measures of benefit for breast screening from the pathology database for Scotland, 1991-2001. J Clin Pathol 2003;56:654-9.
Cong C, Sambandham S. Survival and relapse time among different histology types of breast cancer. Neural Parallel Sci Comput 2009;17:281-90.
Koufopoulos N, Goudeli C, Syrios J, Filopoulos E, Khaldi L. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast: The challenge of diagnosing a rare entity. Rare Tumors 2017;9:7016.
Honma N, Sakamoto G, Ikenaga M, Kuroiwa K, Younes M, Takubo K, et al.
Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast: A case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:1031-3.
Kim SE, Park JH, Hong S, Koo JS, Jeong J, Jung WH, et al.
Primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast: Cytologic finding and expression of MUC5 are different from mucinous carcinoma. Korean J Pathol 2012;46:611-6.
Kong J, Wang H, Zhang Q, Lin Z. Guan H. Primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast coexisting with invasive ductal carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature. Int J Clin Exp Med 2017;10:7256-60.
Lin DL, Hu JL, Shao SH, Sun DM, Wang JG. Primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast with endocervical-like mucinous epithelium. Breast Care (Basel) 2013;8:445-7.
Rakıcı S, Gönüllü G, Gürsel SB, Yıldız L, Bayrak IK, Yücel I, et al.
Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast with estrogen receptor expression: A case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Oncol 2009;2:210-6.
Nisa Z, Barman N, Dasgupta S, Pal M, Sarkar R. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast. J Diagn Pathol 2015;10:34-7.
Weyers W, Mentzel T, Kasper RC, Tosti A, Iorizzo M, Zelger BR, et al
. Fibrous, fibrohistiocytic and histiocytic tumours. In: Fisher CC, LeBoit PE, Burg G, Weedon D, Sarasain A, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Skin Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2006. p. 259-61.
Deepa R, Kumar M, Basu S, Bhaskar A. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the breast- A case report. World J Pathol 2013;2:61-3.
Beaman FD, Kransdorf MJ, Andrews TR, Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Keeling JH, et al.
Superficial soft-tissue masses: Analysis, diagnosis, and differential considerations. Radiographics 2007;27:509-23.
Pedersen L, Zedeler K, Holck S, Schiødt T, Mouridsen HT. Medullary carcinoma of the breast, proposal for a new simplified histopathological definition. Based on prognostic observations and observations on inter- and intraobserver variability of 11 histopathological characteristics in 131 breast carcinomas with medullary features. Br J Cancer 1991;63:591-5.
Gurleyik E, Yildirim U, Gunal O, Pehlivan M. Malignant mesenchymal tumor of the breast: Primary chondrosarcoma. Breast Care (Basel) 2009;4:101-3.
Vandamme S, Geboers I, Vervliet J, Molderez C, Van den Heuvel E, Gaens J, et al
. Case report: Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast, a rare cancer? Belg J Med Oncol 2013;7:89-92.
Murialdo R, Boy D, Musizzano Y, Tixi L, Murelli F, Ballestrero A, et al.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast: A case report. Cases J 2009;2:7336.
Terzi A, Uner AH. An unusual case of invasive papillary carcinoma of the breast. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2012;55:543-5.
] [Full text]
Chauhan K, Garg M. An unusual case of encapsulated papillary carcinoma of breast. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2016;2:224-7.
Saremian J, Rosa M. Solid papillary carcinoma of the breast: A pathologically and clinically distinct breast tumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012;136:1308-11.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]