|
 |
| CASE REPORT |
|
| Year : 2016 | Volume
: 22
| Issue : 2 | Page : 130-133 |
|
|
Cryotherapy for treatment of mouth mucocele
Kamaldeep K Aulakh1, Ramandeep S Brar2, Anurag Azad2, Swati Sharma3, Abhishek Anand3, Bhuvan Jyoti4
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dasmesh Institute of Research and Dental Sciences, Faridkot, India
2 Department of Oral Surgery, Bhabha Rao Ambedkar University, Agra, India
3 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India
4 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Ranchi Institute of Neuro-Psychiatry and Allied Sciences, Kanke, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
| Date of Web Publication | 24-Aug-2016 |
Correspondence Address:
Kamaldeep K Aulakh
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dasmesh Institute of Research and Dental Sciences, Faridkot
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1117-6806.179832
A mucocele is a common salivary gland disorder that most commonly affects young adults. A 35-year-old female patient reported to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, with the chief complaint of swelling on the left side of floor of mouth. The aim of this case report is to present the management of mucocele present in floor of the mouth in a young female patient using liquid nitrogen cryosurgery. The present case report has also discussed mechanism of action, current protocol of cryosurgery with emphasis on clinical pros and cons along with the clinical outcomes. Keywords: Cryotherapy, liquid nitrogen, mucocele, ranula
How to cite this article:
Aulakh KK, Brar RS, Azad A, Sharma S, Anand A, Jyoti B. Cryotherapy for treatment of mouth mucocele. Niger J Surg 2016;22:130-3 |
| Introduction | |  |
Mucocele is a common salivary gland disorder which is defined as a mucus filling cyst that usually appears in the oral cavity, paranasal sinuses, or lacrimal sac. [1],[2] The term mucocele is derived from a Latin word, mucus and cocele meaning cavity. [3] It is the 17 th most common salivary gland lesion seen in the oral cavity. [4] Clinically, mucoceles are of two types (a) extravasation and (b) retention type. Extravasation cyst is usually seen in minor salivary glands and forms due to leakage of fluids from the salivary gland ducts and acini into the surrounding soft tissue, whereas retention type cyst results from obstruction of salivary gland duct and hence is commonly found in ducts of major salivary glands. [5] However, clinically, there is no difference in the two cyst types.
Size of the retention type variant varies from few mm to few cm. Furthermore, it occurs singly and is rarely present bilaterally. [6] It is an asymptomatic, soft, and fluctuant swelling with rapid onset which frequently resolves on its own. [7],[8] It is common in the first three decades of life. Diagnosis of mucocele is pathognomonic so the data about the lesion, location, history of trauma, rapid appearance, variation in size, bluish color, and consistency help in diagnosis of such lesion. [9],[10],[11]
There are several treatment modalities, both surgical and nonsurgical for the treatment of mucocele, of which conventional surgical excision is commonly followed. An alternative treatment for many lesions of the skin and oral cavity including mucoceles is cryosurgery. Cryosurgery is an effective, well-aimed, controlled destruction of diseased tissue by application of cold. [12],[13] It is a well-tolerated procedure which produces excellent results and can be easily performed in the office setting. Considering the fact that biopsy before mucocele surgery may compromise the final results for diagnoses, cryotherapy should be done in such cases. [14]
| Case Report | | |
A 35-year-old female patient reported to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, with the chief complaint of swelling on the left side of the floor of mouth adjacent to tooth number 36. The swelling was present for the past 3 months. Past medical, dental, and family history were not contributory. On clinical examination, the lesion appeared as a single, well-circumscribed swelling of half an inch in size [Figure 1]. It was painful on palpation, flaccid in consistency with clearly defined limits and a smooth surface.
A signed informed consent was taken from the patient for the surgical intervention. Considering her apprehension and treatment benefits, cryosurgery was performed. Local anesthesia (2% xylocaine, 1:80,000 adrenaline) was given to anesthetize the surrounding structures. A closed system consisting of a cryoprobe and nitrous oxide gas was used. Nitrous oxide was released from a high pressure inside the cryotip which was placed directly on the lesion [Figure 2]. The lesion was exposed directly to three consecutive "freeze-thaw cycles" and each cycle lasted for 5-10 s. The cryoprobe was moved from the center of the lesion to the borders until the lesion appeared white and frozen, resembling an ice ball. [Figure 3],[Figure 4] and [Figure 5] show the appearance of the lesion immediately after treatment, at 1 week follow-up, and at 3 months follow-up, respectively.
| Discussion | | |
Mucocele is a salivary gland disorder and also the second most commonly occurring soft-tissue tumor of the oral cavity. Although frequently found in lower lip, it may occur in other locations also. Mechanical and physical trauma such as aggressive tooth brushing and lip biting habits are the main causes for occurrence of such lesions. [15] These lesions are devoid of epithelial lining and are also termed as superficial mucocele and/or classical mucocele. Surgical excision, marsupialization, micro-marsupialization, electrocautery, intralesional corticosteroid injection, and CO 2 laser ablation are some of the conventional methods that have been used and are still used for treatment of mucoceles . [3],[16],[17],[18] For superficial mucoceles, no any surgical treatment is required unless the lesion frequently recurs and is problematic to the patient. If treatment is desired, the options include surgical excision, cryotherapy, and laser vaporization. With most oral ranulas, surgical management is preferred. [16],[17],[18] Of these, cryosurgery is a treatment option which aims at minimal injury/complications to structures lying in proximity to the floor of mouth such as submandibular duct, lingual nerve, and artery. [19]
Cryotherapy is one of the most recent ablation techniques that have been used in the management of esophageal cancer. [20] Patients who are not a candidate for traditional curative resection due to underlying comorbidities of advanced cancer may benefit from this endoscopic treatment modality. While the use of cryotherapy for esophageal cancer is relatively recent, it has been used for some time in the treatment of glottic and subglottic stenosis, radiation proctitis, and for skin conditions such as warts also. [21],[22]
Different studies have suggested that endoscopic spray cryotherapy is effective in treating patients with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal cancer, including those who have failed other forms of treatment, at least in the short term. Specifically, cryotherapy treatment was associated with a complete eradication of Barrett's HGD in 72-100% of patients whereas early stage esophageal cancer patients, a complete response to cryotherapy treatment was observed in 61-100% of patients. [20],[21],[22]
Cryotherapy destroys tissues by application of extreme cold via different cryogen agents such as nitrous oxide gas, liquid nitrogen spray. As nitrous oxide gas is released from a high pressure to a low pressure into the cryotip, the drop in temperature results in freezing of tissues which is in accordance with the fact that for cell death to occur, temperature must fall below −20°C. [20],[21] During the freeze cycle, the drop in temperature results in (a) crystallization of extracellular water and (b) reduction of cell resistance to shrinkage due to membrane lipid hardening. Besides, the electrolyte concentration increases with depleting stores of extracellular water. To counteract this concentration gradient, intracellular water starts moving out of the cell. Furthermore, this water starts crystallizing but remains trapped within the cellular membrane resulting in toxic concentration of intracellular electrolytes. In addition, during the thaw cycle, cells at the lesion's periphery start taking up excess electrolytes and to equalize this gradient difference, water enters the cell thereby leading to swelling and cell lysis. [23],[24]
The benefits of cryotherapy include absence of postoperative discomfort, bloodless surgical site, minimal to zero scarring, and excellent cosmetic results. Moreover, cryotherapy carries the advantage of usefulness in candidates in whom surgery is contraindicated owing to any reason. Furthermore, this therapy is localized in action and can be repeated without any permanent side effects. [25],[26] On the other hand, cryosurgery has certain disadvantages such as unpredictable degree of swelling, lack of precision of depth in area of freezing, slight degree of necrosis, and sloughing which results in delayed healing which can be a bit problematic. [25]
| Conclusion | | |
Mucoceles are common, self-limiting benign lesions resulting from extrinsic and/or self-inflicted trauma. Since these lesions are usually painless, hence they go unnoticed by the person himself/herself. Majority of such cases are identified by the dentists when the patient comes for either routine dental checkups or other unrelated dental problems. There are various treatment options available, but cryosurgery is a valuable treatment of choice pertaining to reduced pain and less recurrence rate.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Baurmash HD. Mucoceles and ranulas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:369-78.  |
| 2. | Ozturk K, Yaman H, Arbag H, Koroglu D, Toy H. Submandibular gland mucocele: Report of two cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:732-5. |
| 3. | Yagüe-García J, España-Tost AJ, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Treatment of oral mucocele-scalpel versus CO2 laser. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:e469-74. |
| 4. | |
| 5. | Boneu-Bonet F, Vidal-Homs E, Maizcurrana-Tornil A, González-Lagunas J. Submaxillary gland mucocele: Presentation of a case. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005;10:180-4. |
| 6. | |
| 7. | Eveson JW. Superficial mucoceles: Pitfall in clinical and microscopic diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;66:318-22. |
| 8. | Bermejo A, Aguirre JM, López P, Saez MR. Superficial mucocele: Report of 4 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:469-72. |
| 9. | Bentley JM, Barankin B, Guenther LC. A review of common pediatric lip lesions: Herpes simplex/recurrent herpes labialis, impetigo, mucoceles, and hemangiomas. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2003;42:475-82. |
| 10. | Andiran N, Sarikayalar F, Unal OF, Baydar DE, Ozaydin E. Mucocele of the anterior lingual salivary glands: From extravasation to an alarming mass with a benign course. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2001;61:143-7. |
| 11. | Guimarães MS, Hebling J, Filho VA, Santos LL, Vita TM, Costa CA. Extravasation mucocele involving the ventral surface of the tongue (glands of Blandin-Nuhn). Int J Paediatr Dent 2006;16:435-9. |
| 12. | Zouboulis CC. Cryosurgery in dermatology. Eur J Dermatol 1998;8:466-74. |
| 13. | Kuflik EG. Cryosurgery updated. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:925-44. |
| 14. | Farah CS, Savage NW. Cryotherapy for treatment of oral lesions. Aust Dent J 2006;51:2-5. |
| 15. | Gupta B, Anegundi R, Sudha P, Gupta M. Mucocele: Two case reports. J Oral Health Community Dent 2007;1:56-8. |
| 16. | López-Jornet P, Bermejo-Fenoll A. Point of care: What is the most appropriate treatment for salivary mucoceles? Which is the best technique for this treatment? J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70:484-5. |
| 17. | Ishida CE, Ramos-e-Silva M. Cryosurgery in oral lesions. Int J Dermatol 1998;37:283-5. |
| 18. | Kopp WK, St-Hilaire H. Mucosal preservation in the treatment of mucocele with CO2 laser. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1559-61. |
| 19. | Shehata EA, Hassan HS. Surgical treatment of ranula: Comparison between marsupialization and sublingual sialadenectomy in pediatric patients. Ann Pediatr Surg 2008;3:89-93. |
| 20. | Gaddam S, Sharma P. Advances in endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of Barrett′s esophagus. J Dig Dis 2010;11:323-33. |
| 21. | Krimsky WS, Rodrigues MP, Malayaman N, Sarkar S. Spray cryotherapy for the treatment of glottic and subglottic stenosis. Laryngoscope 2010;120:473-7. |
| 22. | Hou JK, Abudayyeh S, Shaib Y. Treatment of chronic radiation proctitis with cryoablation. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:383-9. |
| 23. | Pogrel MA. The use of liquid nitrogen cryotherapy in the management of locally aggressive bone lesions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:269-73. |
| 24. | Salmassy DA, Pogrel MA. Liquid nitrogen cryosurgery and immediate bone grafting in the management of aggressive primary jaw lesions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:784-90. |
| 25. | Moraes Pde C, Teixeira RG, Thomaz LA, Arsati F, Junqueira JL, Oliveira LB. Liquid nitrogen cryosurgery for treatment of mucoceles in children. Pediatr Dent 2012;34:159-61. |
| 26. | Narula R, Malik B. Role of cryosurgery in the management of benign and premalignant lesions of the maxillofacial region. Indian J Dent Sci 2012;2:63-6. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Management of oral mucocele by surgical excision in a pediatric patient: A case report |
|
| Ayushi Shashikant Gurharikar, Sargam Sortey, Purva Chaudhari, Devendra Nagpal, Kavita Hotwani, Prabhat Singh Yadav | | Journal of Advances in Dental Practice and Research. 2022; 1: 37 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Management of Mucoceles, Sialoceles, and Ranulas |
|
| Eve M.R. Bowers,Barry Schaitkin | | Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2021; 54(3): 543 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Therapeutic effect of laser on pediatric oral soft tissue problems: a systematic literature review |
|
| Farshad Khosraviani,Sara Ehsani,Mona Fathi,Amir Saberi-Demneh | | Lasers in Medical Science. 2019; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Immunoexpression of HDAC1, HDAC2, and HAT1 in actinic cheilitis and lip squamous cell carcinoma |
|
| ES Chrun,F Modolo,DSC Vieira,ÁLS Borges-Júnior,RG Castro,FI Daniel | | Oral Diseases. 2017; 23(4): 505 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
Related articles