Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Users Online: 117


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 42-47  

Postoperative pain management in emergency surgeries: A one-year survey on perception and satisfaction among surgical patients


Department of Anaesthesia, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Shika, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria

Date of Submission17-Apr-2019
Date of Decision20-Jun-2019
Date of Acceptance15-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication10-Feb-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. AbdulGhaffar A Yunus
Department of Anaesthesia, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Shika, Zaria, Kaduna State
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/njs.NJS_18_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Postoperative pain varies from an individual to individual. It also varies with types and extent of surgery. In general, postoperative pain is inadequately managed in most centers worldwide, especially in developing countries. Therefore, this study presents the perception and satisfaction of postoperative pain management in emergency surgeries. Methods: A 1-year prospective study of the 891 patients who underwent emergency general surgeries at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, from January to December 2018 is hereby presented. Pain scores and patient's satisfaction toward postoperative pain management were considered at 8 and 24 h postoperatively through a predesigned questionnaire. Numeric Pain Rating Scale was used to determine pain intensity and the level of satisfaction following postoperative pain management. Student's t-test was used to compare the pain scores and patient's level of satisfaction of the postoperative pain management. Results: A total of 891 patients were recruited for this study, with a mean age of 36.4 ± 8.9 years with a male-to-female ratio of 1.3:1. Postoperative pain management satisfaction score for patients (98%) who had pain 8-h postoperative period was 4.8 ± 1.6. Similarly, 96.4% of the patients who had pain 24 h postoperatively scored 2.8 ± 1.7. Majority of the patients 481 (54%) were of the American Society of Anesthesiologist physical Class II. Most of the patients underwent general surgery using the technique of general anesthesia. Conclusion: This study indicated that the perception and level of patient's satisfaction regarding postoperative pain management are inadequate. The health professionals and policy makers should be aware that postoperative pain management is suboptimal, as patients still have severe postoperative pain. Therefore, the need for improved postoperative pain management.

Keywords: Analgesics, emergency surgeries, pain score, patient's satisfaction, perception, postoperative pain


How to cite this article:
Yunus AA, Ugwu EM, Ali Y, Olagunju G. Postoperative pain management in emergency surgeries: A one-year survey on perception and satisfaction among surgical patients. Niger J Surg 2020;26:42-7

How to cite this URL:
Yunus AA, Ugwu EM, Ali Y, Olagunju G. Postoperative pain management in emergency surgeries: A one-year survey on perception and satisfaction among surgical patients. Niger J Surg [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 27];26:42-7. Available from: https://www.nigerianjsurg.com/text.asp?2020/26/1/42/277959




  Introduction Top


Postoperative pain is a physiological response to the surgical procedures. It is the major determinant of the overall duration of hospital stay.[1] Every living being perceives pain, irrespective of age, sex, and region. In general, pain is a significant health challenge worldwide.[2] The perception of postoperative pain varies from an individual to individual. The conventional non-patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) method of postoperative pain management which involves the administration of drugs “as and when needed” basis results in inadequate analgesia in at least 50% of patients.[3] In many cases, a combination of analgesics is required for effective pain relief. Unfortunately, no single agent is an ideal choice for all types of patients or no one agent is suitable for all types of pain.[4] Pain management is currently being approached by a combination of both non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options. The major pharmacological options include paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids.[5] In Nigeria, adequate management of postoperative pain remains keen to the anesthetist. Having adopted the multimodal pain management approach to relieving postoperative pain in our patients, we set out to ascertain the patients' perception of pain management postoperatively, in terms of the severity of pain during the first 24-h postoperative period. The outcome of this study will help in projection and prompt requisition of opioids and utilization of other modalities of pain management, thereby improving the postoperative patient care. This is a questionnaire-based study in combination with information generated from the patient's clinical records.


  Methods Top


Following ethical approval from the Hospital Ethics Committee, this questionnaire-based Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital prospective postoperative pain management survey was carried out on 891 patients booked for emergency General Surgeries from January 2018 to December 2018. All recruited patients gave informed consent and were hospitalized for at least 24 h before surgery. The exclusion criteria included patients who were under the age of 18 years, patients who do not want to take part in the study, and those who were admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery. Those with a history of allergy to analgesics, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status IV, epilepsy, and other psychiatric patients were also excluded from the study. All patients received postoperative analgesia through the intravenous (IV) routes, and the choice of analgesic was mainly determined by the availability of the analgesics in the hospital. The study was conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice, an ethical code of conduct that was laid out by the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients were assessed at 8 and 24 h during their postoperative period in the study. The assessment of pain perception and the level of satisfaction with the available pain management were carried out by designated senior registrars, not involved in administering treatment to the patient or have knowledge of the study. This was aimed at eliminating any form of bias.

Before the surgeries, patients were educated on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0 means no pain, 1–3 mild pain, 4–7 moderate pain, and 8–10 the severest pain anybody could ever experience.) and the need for their responses about the severity of postoperative pain and their level of satisfaction on postoperative pain management through a questionnaire [Appendix 1]. The questionnaire is a modified form of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) designed to assess the quality of pain management among the hospitalized adults.[6] Using the questionnaire, the administrator also captured the following: age, gender, and pain intensity 8- and 24-h postoperative period.



Statistical analysis

The demographic variables were presented as: number of patients, mean, and standard deviation (SD), age and gender. Student's t-test was used to compare the pain scores and patient's level of satisfaction of the postoperative management. A statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.


  Results Top


The patient demographic data are presented in [Table 1]. The mean age (±SD) of the study participants was 36.4 ± 8.9 years with a male/female ratio of 1.3:1. Result of the overall pain and patient's satisfaction scores indicated that 98.1% of the patients had pain within 8 h, whereas 96.4% had pain within 24 h with a pain score of 4.9 ± 2.8 and 2.3 ± 1.6, respectively [Table 2]. Patients who had pain within 8 h after surgery had a satisfaction score of 4.8 ± 1.6, whereas those who had pain within 24 h recorded a satisfaction score of 2.8 ± 1.7. From the ASA physical classification in [Figure 1], majority of the patients 481 (54%) were under Grade II, followed by 294 (33%) under Grade I, whereas the rest of the patients 116 (13%) fell under Grade III. General anesthesia was the most used technique for surgery. Of the 891, 663 (74.4%) patients were intubated using general anesthesia, 132 (14.8%) had regional anesthesia, whereas 96 (10.8%) patients had combined technique of anesthesia [Figure 2]. Overall, most of the patients 643 (72.2%) had general surgery, whereas 248 (27.8%) had orthopedic surgery [Figure 3].
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of patients

Click here to view
Table 2: Overall pain and patient satisfaction scores

Click here to view
Figure 1: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification

Click here to view
Figure 2: Techniques of anesthesia

Click here to view
Figure 3: Types of surgery

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


This study was designed to capture the severity of postoperative pain experience and patients' satisfaction with postoperative pain management. We adopted the APS-POQ-R, shown in Appendix 1, which has been considered a valid research tool for the assessment of severity of pain as well as patient's satisfaction toward postoperative pain management.[7] Studies in Denmark and Australia[8] reported the validity of the use of the APS-POQ-R for assessing postoperative pain experience in patients. It has also been used in the United States to ascertain the quality of improvement of pain management in hospitalized adult patients.[6]

From the results of our study, 98.1% of the patients had postoperative pain during the first 8 h after surgery, having a pain score of 4.9 ± 2.8 with a corresponding low satisfaction score of 4.5/10. At 24 h postoperatively, more than 96% of patients reported pain with a score 2.3 ± 1.6 and apparent satisfaction score 2.8 ± 1.7. This reveals that the current standard of care in postoperative pain management in our institution is generally suboptimal. Studies by researchers from different health institutions in Nigeria reported inadequate postoperative pain management; Nasir et al.[9] and Salaudeen et al.[10] reported that pain was infrequently assessed, and analgesic therapy through multimodal was largely not protocol based and therefore, subject to inadequate pain relief. Despite recent advances and the development of more effective techniques for postoperative pain control, a high proportion of patients still experience moderate-to-severe postoperative pain.[11] The study carried out at the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital reported that only 30.5% had positive attitude toward pain assessment and management, whereas 69.5% had a negative attitude.[12] Similarly, a report from Ethiopia indicated that despite patients' paradoxical high satisfaction with pain management, the majority of patients were inadequately and inappropriately treated. Thus, further research is needed to determine how best to break down current barriers to effective postoperative pain management.[13] In Tanzania, postoperative pain management is still a challenge as nearly half of the patients had mild pain in the first 48-h postsurgery.[14]

A prospective hospital-based studies reported pain 24-h postoperative period in 85% of 294 surgical patients,[15] severe pain 7 days postoperatively among 288 patients who underwent either general or orthopedic surgery.[16]

In this study, pain was found to be lower 24 h after surgery compared to pain 8 h after surgery, which was not statistically significant (P < 0.16). This is in contrast to a study that was reported from Tanzania on postoperative pain following ambulation to be greater when compared to pain immediately after surgery.[14]

In this study, the overall patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management in the hospital was an average of 5.3/10. This finding is in contrast to the study of a randomized study which reported a higher rate of patient satisfaction with the IV route of analgesia.[17] This could probably be due to either inadequate dosages or variability in the potency of different types of opioids administered for postoperative pain management. Therefore, a more focused study comparing the types of opioids and different dosage of the same opioids administered for postoperative pain management may give a better satisfaction score. In our center, pentazocine is the most commonly used opioid 72.5%, followed by Pethidine 11.6% as shown in [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Analgesics in use

Click here to view


Severe pain 7 days postoperatively among 288 patients that underwent either general or orthopedic surgery has been reported.[16] In our center, most of the patients underwent general surgery [Figure 3], the worst pain ever experienced was within 24 h postoperatively, which is in contrast with the report by Taylor. However, our patients who underwent orthopedic surgery were among the group of patients known to have the worst pain, but none lasts up to 7 days. This relief, although apparent may be due to the multimodal approach currently being adopted in our center.

As to the techniques of anesthesia, General anesthesia remains the most used technique and effective, except in some cases where combined techniques of general and epidural are used. Patients expressed satisfaction with the technique of general anesthesia. The conventional non-PCA, though the most frequent method for the management of pain[18],[19] results in inadequate analgesia in at least 50% of the patients.[3] The multimodal approach could be the solution to postoperative zero pain.


  Conclusion Top


This study has shown that patient's satisfaction regarding postoperative pain management is inadequate. Therefore, it is recommended that the current postoperative pain management strategy needs to be reviewed with the aim of achieving patient's satisfaction, following postoperative pain management.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Vadivelu N, Mitra S, Narayan D. Recent advances in postoperative pain management. Yale J Biol Med 2010;83:11-25.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Goldberg DS, McGee SJ. Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health 2011;11:770.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Grass JA. Patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 2005;101:S44-61.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Raffa RB. Pharmacology of oral combination analgesics: Rational therapy for pain. J Clin Pharm Ther 2001;26:257-64.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hyllested M, Jones S, Pedersen JL, Kehlet H. Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: A qualitative review. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:199-214.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gordon DB, Polomano RC, Pellino TA, Turk DC, McCracken LM, Sherwood G, et al. Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: Preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Pain 2010;11:1172-86.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Subramanian B, Shastri N, Aziz L, Gopinath R, Karlekar A, Mehta Y, et al. ASSIST – Patient satisfaction survey in postoperative pain management from Indian subcontinent. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2017;33:40-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
8.
Botti M, Khaw D, Jørgensen EB, Rasmussen B, Hunter S, Redley B. Cross-cultural examination of the structure of the revised American pain society patient outcome questionnaire (APS-POQ-R). J Pain 2015;16:727-40.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Nasir AA, Ameh EA, Abdur-Rahman LO, Kolawole IK, Oyedepo OO, Adeniran JO. Postoperative pain management in children: A survey of practices of pediatric surgeons in Nigeria. J Clin Sci 2017;14:138-43.  Back to cited text no. 9
  [Full text]  
10.
Salaudeen GO, Afuwape OO, Eyelade OR, Olapade-Olaopa EO. Effectiveness of postoperative analgesia in the management of acute pain in day-case surgeries. Ann Afr Med 2018;17:140-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
11.
Ogboli-Nwasor E, Sule ST, Yusufu LM. Pattern of postoperative pain management among adult surgical patients in a low-resource setting. J Pain Res 2012;5:117-20.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Famakinwa TT, Oyeniran YA, Bello BD. Post-operative pain assessment and management among nurses in a teaching hospital in ILE-IFE. Int J Basic Appl Innov Res 2014;3:100-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Woldehaimanot TE, Eshetie TC, Kerie MW. Postoperative pain management among surgically treated patients in an Ethiopian hospital. PLoS One 2014;9:e102835.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Masigati HG, Chilonga KS. Postoperative pain management outcomes among adults treated at a tertiary hospital in Moshi, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res 2014;16:47-53.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Chung JW, Lui JC. Postoperative pain management: Study of patients' level of pain and satisfaction with health care providers' responsiveness to their reports of pain. Nurs Health Sci 2003;5:13-21.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Taylor RS, Ullrich K, Regan S, Broussard C, Schwenkglenks M, Taylor RJ, et al. The impact of early postoperative pain on health-related quality of life. Pain Pract 2013;13:515-23.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Lebovits AH, Zenetos P, O'Neill DK, Cox D, Dubois MY, Jansen LA, et al. Satisfaction with epidural and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Pzain Med 2001;2:280-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Momeni M, Crucitti M, De Kock M. Patient-controlled analgesia in the management of postoperative pain. Drugs 2006;66:2321-37.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Moss E, Tavener T, Norton P, Lesser P, Cole P. A survey of postoperative pain management in fourteen hospitals in the UK. Acute Pain 2005;7:13-20.  Back to cited text no. 19
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed698    
    Printed57    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded57    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal